Shane's trial of technology

Most students felt comfortable with interactive learning components created with PowerPoint and also with video conferencing. However a few would still prefer face-to-face delivery instead of video conferencing. Their feed back is given in a nut shell.

The good

·         Video conferencing satisfactory, supporting documents would be preferred.

·         Timing of video – explanatory video should be presented first instead of midway between lectures. It will help understand the concept first.

·         Both Video conferencing and face-to-face classes were delivered well

·         New project made a big difference.

·         Video from Endress & Hauser was very good.

·         The class was better due to more interaction.

·         Video at the start of the lesson will be very good.

The not so good

·         Power point presentation does not align well with work book.